Diving in the alphabet soup

  • 19 April 2022 (7 min read)

Key Points

  • Although the market’s reaction was positive, the ECB’s press conference leaned to the hawkish side on substance. Yet, Lagarde’s openness to use an “anti-fragmentation” weapon is reassuring. We need to go back to 2012 to explore the possible avenues for the ECB on this matter.
  • Core inflation surprised to the downside in the US in March. It’s too early to call for the inflation rollover though.

The market moderated its expectations for the ECB rate lift-off after Christine Lagarde’s press conference last week. True, instead of an acceleration in the termination of QE which some investors were fearing, the Governing Council chose to stick to the timeline sketched out last month. Still, we found the overall message rather hawkish: the central bank is visibly getting even more nervous about the risks of inflation persistence, and although Christine Lagarde expressed several times a willingness to be very cautious in the face of the uncertainty created by the war in Ukraine, overall it seems the ECB’s baseline is that the fallout should be manageable. The Governing Council also seems unimpressed by the tightening in financial conditions.

Yet, the bond market has welcome Christine Lagarde’s readiness to “design and deploy” anti-fragmentation weapons if and when necessary. She was remarkably guarded about the form that such programmes could take though. It’s understandable given the technical and technical difficulties already faced by the ECB in the past when designing tools to specifically address monetary policy transmission difficulties, while it was preparing to normalize its stance. We go back in time to 2010/2012 and the debates around the SMP and OMT. The latter - although never used – has been seen for 10 years as the “go to” anti-fragmentation weapon. It is cumbersome though, even if alternatives are not necessarily appealing.  We note however that there is an imbalance between what the ECB is being asked to do – create more Ptolemaic circles around its core missions to deal with every shortcoming of monetary union – and the contribution from national governments. In 2012, the solution to the sovereign crisis did not come from the ECB only, but also from the governments’ capacity to put together new frameworks, such as the ESM. We continue to think that without an extension of Next Generation EU, the ECB may be forced into “half solutions”, such as mobilizing the reinvestment from the QE programmes to support the most fragile signatures.

Meanwhile, the US dataflow has come up with a rare feat last week: core inflation rose less than expected last week. It’s too early to call the “inflation rollover” in the US though: the contribution from one single component (used cars) was essential. Yet, we continue to believe in a subsequent deceleration in consumer prices in the US which will allow the Fed to stop before reaching the levels seen in the “dot plot”.

Download the Insight
Download report (447.43 KB)

Related Articles

Viewpoint Chief Economist

Geopolitics beyond Ukraine

  • by Gilles Moëc
  • 16 May 2022 (7 min read)
Viewpoint Chief Economist

Policy tectonic plates shifting

  • by Gilles Moëc
  • 02 May 2022 (7 min read)
Viewpoint Chief Economist

Macron 2.0

  • by Gilles Moëc
  • 25 April 2022 (7 min read)

    Disclaimer

    This document is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment research or financial analysis relating to transactions in financial instruments as per MIF Directive (2014/65/EU), nor does it constitute on the part of AXA Investment Managers or its affiliated companies an offer to buy or sell any investments, products or services, and should not be considered as solicitation or investment, legal or tax advice, a recommendation for an investment strategy or a personalized recommendation to buy or sell securities.

    It has been established on the basis of data, projections, forecasts, anticipations and hypothesis which are subjective. Its analysis and conclusions are the expression of an opinion, based on available data at a specific date.

    All information in this document is established on data made public by official providers of economic and market statistics. AXA Investment Managers disclaims any and all liability relating to a decision based on or for reliance on this document. All exhibits included in this document, unless stated otherwise, are as of the publication date of this document.

    Furthermore, due to the subjective nature of these opinions and analysis, these data, projections, forecasts, anticipations, hypothesis, etc. are not necessary used or followed by AXA IM’s portfolio management teams or its affiliates, who may act based on their own opinions. Any reproduction of this information, in whole or in part is, unless otherwise authorised by AXA IM, prohibited.