Investment Institute
Viewpoint Chief Economist

Policy tectonic plates shifting

  • 02 May 2022 (7 min read)

Key points

  • Massive demand for policy action is meeting a policy vacuum now that central banks move away from fiscal dominance.
  • In the Euro area, upside risks to inflation are materializing while Q1 GDP partly contradicts the positive message from the business surveys. The ECB is likely to focus more on the first point.

We expect the Federal Reserve (Fed) to hike by 50bps this week, and the European Central Bank (ECB)’s rhetoric is getting increasingly hawkish to the point that a July lift-off cannot be excluded. This is more than mere “normalization". The whole policy-mix is changing. We need to brace ourselves for “instant nostalgia” for the brief era of unlimited policy support – and fiscal dominance – which the pandemic had ushered in. The West is faced with a potential policy vacuum at a time when demand for action is massive: tolerance for income inequality has ebbed, demographic challenges push for a structural drift in public spending, and citizens want decisive intervention to fight climate change together with a minimization of the impact the energy transition will have on their income.

We see three ways to resolve the tension between unlimited demand for policy action and a depleted arsenal. First, governments could decide to “call the monetary policy bluff” and maintain an extremely accommodative fiscal stance, counting on central banks to recoil at the political and economic consequences of massive policy divergence and ultimately neglect price stability to accept fiscal dominance again. Turning the clock back on central bank independence would be an extreme form of this approach. We would ascribe a low probability to this, given the huge transition costs for fiscal authorities themselves. Second, we could see a “self-limitation” of economic policy which would give up on reacting to every twist and turn of the cycle – in short a return to the 1990s. Politics are much more hystericized though and it’s unclear if our already polarized western democracies would cope well with allowing unmitigated patches of rising unemployment and declining real income. Third, governments could be tempted to harness the financial capacity of the corporate sector to achieve their goals. This could take an aggressive form – e.g. windfall taxes or regulatory pressure – or a cooperative one – e.g. incentivizing businesses to deal with global warming and the demographic challenges. A “combo” mixing these different approaches is likely to emerge, but in any case, redefining the scope of economic policy is likely to strain our democracies.

Moving away from this “high level” discussion, we look into more details in the current ECB debate in the light of the latest, contrasting dataflow: more inflation risks are materializing, while the print for Q1 GDP dampens the positivity of the message sent by the recent businesses surveys. Given the mood at the ECB, it is however likely that more weight is going to be put on the former than on the latter.

Download the Insight
Download report (365.46 KB)

Related Articles

Viewpoint Chief Economist

It’s Getting Tighter

  • by Gilles Moëc
  • 20 June 2022 (7 min read)
Viewpoint Chief Economist

Bad Peripheral Vision

  • by Gilles Moëc
  • 13 June 2022 (7 min read)
Viewpoint Chief Economist

How to make friends and influence countries

  • by Gilles Moëc
  • 07 June 2022 (7 min read)

    Disclaimer

    This document is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment research or financial analysis relating to transactions in financial instruments as per MIF Directive (2014/65/EU), nor does it constitute on the part of AXA Investment Managers or its affiliated companies an offer to buy or sell any investments, products or services, and should not be considered as solicitation or investment, legal or tax advice, a recommendation for an investment strategy or a personalized recommendation to buy or sell securities.

    It has been established on the basis of data, projections, forecasts, anticipations and hypothesis which are subjective. Its analysis and conclusions are the expression of an opinion, based on available data at a specific date.

    All information in this document is established on data made public by official providers of economic and market statistics. AXA Investment Managers disclaims any and all liability relating to a decision based on or for reliance on this document. All exhibits included in this document, unless stated otherwise, are as of the publication date of this document.

    Furthermore, due to the subjective nature of these opinions and analysis, these data, projections, forecasts, anticipations, hypothesis, etc. are not necessary used or followed by AXA IM’s portfolio management teams or its affiliates, who may act based on their own opinions. Any reproduction of this information, in whole or in part is, unless otherwise authorised by AXA IM, prohibited.