How curved is the curve?


Key points: 

  • The US labour market is gently cooling, but we think the Fed will remain on its guard
  • Isabel Schnabel’s take on the Phillips curve still comes with hawkish undertones

The payroll data came out exactly like Jay Powell would probably have wanted them: the downward revision to the previous months in job creation solidifies a move into below-trend territory, while a lower-than-expected wage print came as an additional boon. It would now take a very bad surprise in the inflation print for August to convince the FOMC to hike again on 20 September, and this adds to our belief that “peak Fed Funds” was hit in July.

We explore this week in more details the “Waller hypothesis,” i.e., the possibility that US inflation could go back to 2% with merely a decline in job opportunities – i.e., the possibility to change to new jobs – rather than a decline in existing jobs. A paper by Benigno and Eggertsson suggests that the Phillips curve gets particularly steep once job vacancies exceed the number of employment seekers, providing a persuasive explanation of the recent inflation wave. This could be good news: indeed, symmetrically, a steeper curve would be consistent with a swift decline in inflation once labour market loosens via a decline in openings without necessarily entailing much job destruction. This approach does not consider second-round effects though, such as the memory of the inflation shock which could trigger some wage/inflation catch-ups. In any case, even if they have improved, indicators of labour market tension such as the job opening and quit rates are still visibly above their pre-Covid levels. We think the Fed will err on the side of caution – consistent with our long-held view that rate cuts will take their time.

Arguably, the same phenomena could be at work in the Euro area. We note however that in her speech last week, Isabel Schnabel focused on another approach to the Phillips curve, based on firms’ strategic pricing behaviour, which provides a more hawkish alternative to the Benigno-Eggertsson model. With core inflation only marginally receding, the ECB hawks are not lowering their guard, even if some of them – including Schnabel – now accepts the possibility – but not the certainty – of a “skip” at the September meeting (but a skip would not necessarily be the prologue to a plateau but could be a short pause).

Download the full insight
Download insight (579.97 KB)

Related Articles

Market Updates

Take Two: US stocks hit new record as Trump elected US President and Fed cuts interest rates

Market Updates

What will a new US President mean for markets and the global economy?

Market Updates

AXA IM US election reaction: what Trump's win means for markets and investors

    Disclaimer

    This document is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment research or financial analysis relating to transactions in financial instruments as per MIF Directive (2014/65/EU), nor does it constitute on the part of AXA Investment Managers or its affiliated companies an offer to buy or sell any investments, products or services, and should not be considered as solicitation or investment, legal or tax advice, a recommendation for an investment strategy or a personalized recommendation to buy or sell securities.

    It has been established on the basis of data, projections, forecasts, anticipations and hypothesis which are subjective. Its analysis and conclusions are the expression of an opinion, based on available data at a specific date.

    All information in this document is established on data made public by official providers of economic and market statistics. AXA Investment Managers disclaims any and all liability relating to a decision based on or for reliance on this document. All exhibits included in this document, unless stated otherwise, are as of the publication date of this document.

    Furthermore, due to the subjective nature of these opinions and analysis, these data, projections, forecasts, anticipations, hypothesis, etc. are not necessary used or followed by AXA IM’s portfolio management teams or its affiliates, who may act based on their own opinions. Any reproduction of this information, in whole or in part is, unless otherwise authorised by AXA IM, prohibited.

    Issued in the UK by AXA Investment Managers UK Limited, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority in the UK. Registered in England and Wales No: 01431068. Registered Office: 22 Bishopsgate London EC2N 4BQ

    In other jurisdictions, this document is issued by AXA Investment Managers SA’s affiliates in those countries.